Guardrail findings became useful only when they could guide a review. The implementation mapped issues into prompts with section, severity, evidence, and source information so a reviewer could return to the relevant material.
Local actions could acknowledge, defer, dismiss, reject, resolve, or reopen a prompt. Each transition created audit history while keeping the status vocabulary explicitly separate from medical correctness.
The workflow cannot certify, finalize, diagnose, recommend treatment, or turn a resolved prompt into clinical validation. Its purpose is to organize attention and preserve a review trail.
Automated tests and synthetic interface flows exercise the current mechanics. Ophthalmologist review, multilingual copy review, real-device audio and speech behavior, physical storage protections, legal and regulatory analysis, and complete release validation remain pending.
← Back to ClinScribe Local